More Pages: Turner Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90


Even for Osprey, Very Weak
Good for modelers, brief for historiansYou could add Osprey's "MONS 1914" for a more complete view of the BEF.


Poor presentation of StanfordThis book is quite a disappointment. Suffering both from poor editing and omission of crucial facts, the contents do not flow smoothly. The text is presented in a somewhat offensively over-refined and pretentious manner, the kind one finds in art museum catalogs or as introductions to Penguin Classics. The reader gains little sense of the beauty of the campus, as only a few of the photographs depict the excellent landscaping, the detail of Quad buildings, or the quality of materials and construction of the buildings. The foothills of the Stanford campus, and the trails leading up to the Dish aren't even included -- an omission that reflects poorly on the editors. Equally poor editorial judgment can be found in the photograph of the Hoover Tower appearing in one of the chapters -- this famous landmark is shown in its early construction, as an unsightly steel frame amid a dirt field.
To the credit of the authors, they give an engaing account of the history of the variously defined Stanford master plans, and of the culture which gave rise to the different stages of the campus' expansion.
In general, the reader's labors are not rewarded with fresh perspectives, or a sense of the spirit that habituates Stanford. If one toured the Stanford campus before reading the book, one might wonder what drove the editors to present such an excellent environment so vapidly.


All Cracked Up Over Egg-Drop Blues

Too Specific

Overpriced and overrated!

This Book May Be Dangerous To Your Financial Health!But on the negative side, he is often factually challenged, and promotes a "strategy" which is high risk and is reminiscent of a snake oil salesman. Buyer beware.
According to the gospel of Garth, he informs us of how the world will unfold beyond 1997: more taxes, pension tension, intergenerational warfare, plunging values for residential real estate, surging corporate profits, soaring stock markets, and a massive inflow into mutual funds.
Today, these predictions lie in ruins. The October 2000 budget reduced taxes by $100 billion over 5 years. Turner says the Canada Pension Plan is teetering on the brink of insolvency, and will collapse by the year 2010. In fact, the chief actuary for the CPP reported the CPP is sustainable to the year 2060.
Corporate profits have slumped in recent years, and the stock market has been badly mauled. The Toronto market plunged 50% between September 1, 2000 and October 9, 2002 and the S & P 500 suffered a similar decrease. NASDAQ? Well, it fell off nearly 80% from peak to trough. By contrast, residential real estate has been a strong performer the past few years, exactly the opposite of what Turner has said.
Turner's strategy is that baby boomers have no choice but to borrow against their home equity (which is earning them nothing), and buy stocks and mutual funds which will provide annual returns of 12%-15%. The past 5 years have exposed the foolishness of this strategy, and thousands of people who acted on his advice are now paying a heavy price for it. But Turner even suggests that Gordon Pape and the late Andy Sarlos were giving Canadians alarming advice by urging caution with respect to Turner's strategies. In hindsight, they were right and Turner is wrong.
Garth Turner served as Minister of National Revenue in the short-lived Kim Campbell government of 1993, a year in which Canada suffered its worst ever fiscal deficit of $42 billion. Enough said.


Hard Core Disappointment

Early lack of dialogue halts momentumUnfortunately, this novel is neither 'lively' (as one early review stated) nor engaging by today's standards. Duncan's contrived view of the Murchisons and their world is difficult because one is constatly reminded that one is reading a novel. Duncan's characters act and do, they do not feel, think, or emote. The characters, plot, and setting are all contrivances that convey a subtly ironic, political message.
In sum, I doubt very many people would be will to read this book for enjoyment nowadays, although it is still of Canadian historical importance.


Run away! Run away!Some good reproductions though, and if you're just interested in the pictures, the price is right. Hence the two stars; the text would be zero, since it's useless.


Knights in Kentucky
"The Old Contemptibles" (TOC), however, accomplishes neither a broad overview nor pointed detail. It addresses the British Expeditionary Force (BEF)of 1914 and it precedent years beginning in 1902. Its scope is so broad that it only mentions the highlights of the 1902 Army and it reforms, the overseas Army, the home based reserves, and the planning for and creation of the BEF.
The BEF's actions in France and Belgium are essentially addressed in a one-line chronological list of actions. Several examples of brigade level actions follow, but they are placed in almost no context. The BEF Order of Battle is not mentioned and there is no feeling of the committment and grinding destruction of what may have been Britian's finest fighting force. The author often mentions the quality of the BEF and does provide some background in the genisis of that quality, but its base in the regimental system in scarcely addressed.
The uniform plates are adequate. Again, they cover 12 years of evolution and the entire globe in geography and barely scratch the surface. Once more, context is nearly absent.
I conclude that the scope of the volume was simply too wide for the standard Osprey approach. The subject would have been much better served as two or even three volumes. With the exception of the color plates and several excellent B&W photographs, I cannot recommend TOC as an introduction to the BEF. The text certainly does not meet any reasonable standard.